[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: frame-by-frame advancing

Subject: Re: frame-by-frame advancing
From: Rolf Howarth <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:40:36 +0000

At 20:51 -0500 7/1/02, Eric Smith wrote:

The use of nextTimeStep is preferred to the older nextTimeMediaSample flag because nextTimeStep works with MPEG media (as well as with ordinary multi-sampled media).

Hmm, are you sure about that? I just tried counting frames with nextTimeStep and getNextInterestingTime still shows nothing for an MPEG track, ie. it steps straight from the beginning to the end of the track. That's using the Track version. If I use the Movie version of getNextInterestingTime it steps through one time unit at a time, reporting that my 15 second MPEG movie has 9000 frames...

-Rolf
--
Rolf Howarth, Square Box Systems Ltd, Stratford-upon-Avon UK.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: frame-by-frame advancing
  - From: Eric Smith <email@hidden>

References:
	>frame-by-frame advancing (From: Dmitry Beransky <email@hidden>)
	>Re: frame-by-frame advancing (From: Eric Smith <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: Seeking help: video capture failures and crashes
Next by Date: Re: frame-by-frame advancing
Previous by thread: Re: frame-by-frame advancing
Next by thread: Re: frame-by-frame advancing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home