User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
Hello,
thank you very much, you solved my problem : I was using glibtoolize
instead of libtoolize. Satom now works on MacOSX and I am very happy.
Best,
Thomas
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Thomas DEGRIS wrote:
For a more general point of view, is MacOSX able to load multiple
libraries defining the same symbol ? If yes, do you know projects
(using libtools and automake) that use this method ?
The answer remains that loadable bundles are better, use the GNU libtool
-module flag for *all* the libraries which will be loaded at runtime
and you
should be fine.
Now, it can also load dynamic shared libraries which are linked
without the
-flat_namespace flag, in order to get gnu libtool to create such
libraries
one must use the GNU libtool -no-undefined flag in your Makefile.am
(assuming your libraries have no undefined symbols), or set
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 in your environment during configure and
make.
I think I mistyped this as MAC_OSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET in my previous post.
I hope you have installed the latest and greatest gnu
autoconf/automake/libtool releases in /usr/local (or some prefix other
than
/usr) before trying all this, the glibtool in /usr/bin is a little
older and
behaves differently.
I'm sorry, I simply don't have the time right now to look at your
project.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Unix-porting mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/unix-porting/email@hidden
