On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
[snip]
It seemed like one, and I must have gotten lucky; after I "cleaned
up" and rebuilt, I now get this complaint:
g++ -g -pipe -fpic -DPIC -dynamic -single_module -
twolevel_namespace -weak_reference_mismatches weak -undefined
dynamic_lookup p_Procs_Lib_FieldZp.dl_og -o p_Procs_FieldZp.sog
/usr/bin/ld: -single_module or -multi_module flags can only be
used when -dylib is also specified
at a different spot in the build. Any thoughts? Should -dynamic
be -dylib?
Depends on what p_Procs_FieldZp.sog is. If it's a main executable,
you shouldn't be passing either -single_module or -multi_module.
If it's a dylib, you should be passing -dylib.
It appears to be a shared library, although its pretty arcane - it
includes something which is a sort of header file, which redefines
everything in sight, many times :-}
Do I replace -dynamic with -dylib?
I'd guess that it's a main executable and they're passing -dynamic
because on some systems -static would be the default (meaning a
static binary). Static binaries aren't supported on Mac OS X, so -
dynamic is the default.
Changing configure.in is great, but to get the fix to be used in
the build you'll also have to re-run autoconf to regenerate the
configure file.
This, I think, will be the easy part :-}
Usually, but it might depend on which version of autoconf they
support. :)
'configure' sez it was gen'd by version 2.13. We're at 2.59 on 10.4.7.
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
-----------
I'm beginning to like the cut of his jibberish.
-----------
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Unix-porting mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/unix-porting/email@hidden
