I've used WO 5.2, 5.2.1 and now 5.2.2 for my Java Client app.
Search the archives for previous comments about this from me.
My comments are the almost the same for any version of WO I've used
(4.5 -> present). It's nice to be able to use all the EOF concepts in
a client app and not have to implement the client-server
communication. However, although a number of bugs have been fixed
over the versions, JC remains a little bit quirkier and buggier than
using WO to build a web application.
In my case, I had a full-fledged Swing app already with a different
back end, so it made sense to not use Interface Builder. Also, when I
tried to use Interface Builder (4.5 days), it seemed that there was
not enough flexibility and too many things undocumented for it to be
of use for a building a complex UI (which is what I have).
At 4:13 PM +1100 11/20/03, Marek Wawrzyczny wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone used WO 5.2.x with Java client and Swing, any comments?
We have developed apps using nibs and Interface Builder (in WO
5.1.x) and the process was less then satisfactory for us. We want to
use other IDEs for interface building (such as jBuilder). Also does
anyone know offhand of the benefits/pitfalls of the 5.2.x upgrades
in respect to Java client?
All feedback greatly appreciated.
Marek Wawrzyczny
software engineer
-------------------------->
ish group pty ltd
7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia
phone +61 2 9660 1400 fax +61 2 9660 7400
http www.ish.com.au | email email@hidden
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
--
Nick Pilch / email@hidden
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
