Re: Java Packages for Dummies

• Subject: Re: Java Packages for Dummies
• From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>
• Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:03:12 +0100
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

Am 05.12.2007 um 14:44 schrieb Mike Schrag:

It turns out to be almost never the case that you want to fetch all "Open Tasks". It tends to be the case for us that you almost always want to have additional qualifiers on those searches, which ends up that you fault a HUGE (many thousands) of EO's in just to turn back around and filter them down in memory. Instead, I can remove that relationship completely and provide just the variant of the to-many that takes a qualifier.

But I do recall you fixing that NSArray bug, now, and I actually haven't timed this out ... Might be interesting to see a graph of fault speed as that array size grows on a "normal" sized EO.

Cheers, Anjo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Fat relationships: i.e. user <--->> transactions
    • From: "Pierce T. Wetter III" <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: Java Packages for Dummies
• Next by Date: When to model both sides of a relationship (was Java Packages for Dummies)
• Previous by thread: Re: Java Packages for Dummies
• Next by thread: Fat relationships: i.e. user <--->> transactions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread