Why don't they just call it a SharedViewingContext ? :-)
Or an EOReadMostlyObjectStore? I don't know. What I suspect is that
someone was lazy, wanted some of the API from EOEditingContext, and
so sub-classed it and the name. It probably did not seem that
harmful at the time...
Chuck
On 27 Dec 2007, at 20:17, Chuck Hill wrote:
The problem is that people see sharedEDITINGCONTEXT and think
EOEditingContext and it is NOT really an editing context.