Oh. a cron-based DB dump for sure, but then those dumps are versioned
by time machine to at least another volume.
On 10/29/07, Mike Schrag <email@hidden> wrote:
> Especially check out the discussions about the bugs with Aperture and
> its corruption when it writes during Time Machine backups -- It may
> apply. I would definitely lean towards using a proper db dump for
> backups instead.
>
> ms
>
> On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:21 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 2007/10/29, at 22:48, Joe Little wrote:
> >
> >> Loved these instructions. I may just go ahead and move one of our
> >> servers to 10.5 along with this (already worked great on my laptop)
> >> just so I can keep WO 5.3 _and_ get the benefits of TimeMachine for
> >> backing up my databases.
> >
> > Be careful with that... backing-up live DBs just by coping files is
> > a path to disaster, unless you are using some kind of WAL...
> >
> > Yours
> >
> > Miguel Arroz
> >
> > Miguel Arroz
> > http://www.terminalapp.net
> > http://www.ipragma.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/email@hidden
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
