Peter,
It is completely unclear how the GL components shipped with
Leopard's X11 are actually built. The X11-0.46.4 source tree has
its own GL subdirectory. However none of the source tarballs
at http://people.freedesktop.org/~bbyer/sources/ seem to
have such a GL subdirectory. This leaves the option of building
in the Mesa directory. I can certainly hack this to build
a libGLw by copying the GLwXm subdirectory from the Tiger
X11 source tree to Mesa-6.5.2/src/glw and changing
GLwDrawA.c to have...
#include <GLwXm/PrimitiveP.h>
However the resulting libGLw.dylib will be linked against the
Mesa libGL which is of compatibility level 1.5.0 instead of
1.2.0. Alternatively, if I try to substitute the installed
Leopard X11R6 libGL.dylib, I run up against the cyclic link
error when creating libGLw.dylib. I can't use the framework
libGL linkage hack here because that leaves _glXChooseVisual
and a few other symbols undefined when attempting to link
libGLw.dylib. Sigh, I wish the Xcode developers would hurry
up and release a preview of the Xcode tools update fixing
these cyclic linkage issues.
Jack
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:57:15PM -0600, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Peter,
> > Are the Tiger X11 sources still available? It seems that...
> >
> > http://people.freedesktop.org/~bbyer/sources/
>
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.10.ppc/X11-0.46.4/
>
> Peter
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
