[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bloated binaries (still)

Subject: Re: Bloated binaries (still)
From: David Catmull <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:00:20 -0600

It turned out that, for some reason, generating debug symbols was turned on for my Deployment style.

Then it turned out that, without ZeroLink, I had to include an extra source file in the host app, full of functions it never uses. I'm starting to miss CodeWarrior.

One that was done, my plugins were down to a more reasonable 700-900k, but to balance that out the app exploded from 20k to 6MB. Was that 20k file some kind of ZeroLink stub thing, while all the real code was somewhere else?

On Aug 27, 2004, at 1:44 PM, Larry Nipko wrote:

In xcode for deployment target settings check the box called Deployment
PostProcessing.

Thanks, that helped a lot. The plugins are now another ~150k smaller, and the app is down to 1MB. I can live with that. I guess the real mystery is, why wasn't this option turned on to begin with?

--
David Catmull
email@hidden
http://www.uncommonplace.com/
_______________________________________________
xcode-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bloated binaries (still)
  - From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>

References:
	>Bloated binaries (still) (From: David Catmull <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Bloated binaries (still) (From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: Xcode build system... what's the best choice?
Next by Date: Re: Xcode build system... what's the best choice?
Previous by thread: Re: Bloated binaries (still)
Next by thread: Re: Bloated binaries (still)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home