[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?

Subject: Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?
From: Andrew Kimpton <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 23:16:49 -0700
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Chris Espinosa wrote:

For 10.3 we recommend that you just build with gcc 4.0 and advise your users to update to 10.3.9. It's free, it's more stable, it's more secure.

If you (or someone at Apple) can share how much of the 10.3 installed base has upgraded (or expected to upgrade in the next 'n' months) to 10.3.9 that would really help make the case with my marketing and sales folk who are concerned that not supporting earlier versions of 10.3 is a problem.

The figures from the keynote presentation this morning about Tiger adoption look really good - even better if those 'lagards' on 10.3 have all upgraded to 10.3.9 soon !

Thanks

Chris

Andrew 8-)

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>gcc 3.3 and universal format ? (From: Andrew Kimpton <email@hidden>)
	>Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ? (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Xcode 2.1 Installer Errors....
Next by Date: Re: Enabling Intel compilation?
Previous by thread: Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?
Next by thread: Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home