[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XCode 2.0: what happened to long long?

Subject: Re: XCode 2.0: what happened to long long?
From: Frederick Cheung <email@hidden>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:30:32 +0100
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden


On 25 Jun 2005, at 14:25, Ken Brooks wrote:

This code quit compiling when I went to XCode 2.0. What's up with long long?
   typedef unsigned long long PathTrace;
    const PathTrace trace0 = 0;
    const PathTrace trace1 = 0x8000000000000000;
    long long myvar = 0x8000000000000000;
The errors:
/Users/ken/Programs/Cat & Mouse 2view + AI/TestFile.cpp:4: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type /Users/ken/Programs/Cat & Mouse 2view + AI/TestFile.cpp:6: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type


You need to append LL or ULL to the constant (eg 0x8000000000000000ULL)

Fred
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

Follow-Ups:
- Re: XCode 2.0: what happened to long long?
  - From: Ken Brooks <email@hidden>

References:
	>XCode 2.0: what happened to long long? (From: Ken Brooks <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: XCode 2.0: what happened to long long?
Next by Date: Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
Previous by thread: XCode 2.0: what happened to long long?
Next by thread: Re: XCode 2.0: what happened to long long?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home