| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
I don't agree with either of these posts because they come from an English-centric perspective. I think developers should be using the ISO abbreviations (as Apple has been telling them to do for a long, long time now) and that the Finder should display localized, human- readable versions of them in the "Get Info" window.
How is it that the user experience for a Spanish user, for example, is better when the languages are shown as "English", "Spanish" etc instead of "Inglés", "Español" and so forth? You said that abbreviations are "unnatural", "disgusting" and not "humane" (fairly strong words, perhaps you need to calm down) but I suspect that you only think so because you speak English...
Everybody else in the world who doesn't speak English probably finds the use of unabbreviated English language names equally unfriendly and almost as unintelligible.
It's 2005 and there's really no excuse for not being fully localized.
Exactly! _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj (From: João Varela <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj (From: Scott Tooker <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj (From: "Alexey Proskuryakov" <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj (From: Brian Krent <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj (From: Greg Hurrell <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.