The class modeler seems to be confused by "std::string
variable". It parses the member name as string and the type as
unknown.
Is there a way around this? I know that "using namespace std"
fixes the problem, but I am writing utility classes that will be
used by other members of my team and they may not be using STL.
I am using STL in my classes, but I don't want to force them to
use STL.
The class modeler, like many other symbolically-driven parts of
Xcode (the Project Symbols smartgroup, the Class Browser, Find
Definition, and command-doubleclick navigation) is driven off of
the project index, and the C++ project indexer does not capture or
store namespace information at this time. Items that are
distinguished only by namespace may become confused.
The issue is NOT poor support for namespaces in various areas.
The issue is the parser for the modeler is plain wrong out when it
comes across a scope resolution operator. It does NOT traverse to the
last scope resolution operator and then uses the result as type and
the next token as the name.
E.g:
A::B::C::D::string foo;
is scope: A::B::C::D type: string name: foo and not scope: undefined
type: unknown name : A
A "using namespace std;" directive in a HEADER file is not a
workaround but simply poor style that renders the whole concept of
namespaces for a whole codebase useless. An IDE requiring developers
to do this does not help them produce good code but plain enforces
poor style. (I hope at least in the Java camp there is support for
packages.. )
Regards,
Tom_E
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden
