on 5/3/06 11:06 PM, Christoph Bergmann wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea, but so far I haven't been able to make this work.
>
> Normally our operators are provided in a dylib.
It worked for us because our operators are in a static library.
> I also tried creating a small static library which contained the out-of-line
> operators, and linking that into the application. Unfortunately this doesn't
> appear to be working either - the linker complains that the symbols in the
> application's unexported_symbols_list are not present (even though 'nm' shows
> them as being exported from the static library.)
This rings a bell. I think that happened to us on our release builds
because the symbols were being stripped. I'm not absolutely sure, though,
and the guy who solved these mysteries is on vacation.
Shouldn't two-level namespaces prevent this kind of problem?
-Marc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
