Re: staticly linked libc ?

• Subject: Re: staticly linked libc ?
• From: Dave Dyer <email@hidden>
• Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:40:55 -0800
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

I have a plugin which works fine under osx 10.4 but fails to load
under 10.2.  I chased the problem into libsystem.B.dylib, which 
includes _fprintf _sscanf and _sprintf in 10.4 but does not
contain these functions in 10.2

I'm thinking that a plausible way to address this problem is to
staticly link libc

My question is, how do I direct xcode to do this?

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: staticly linked libc ?
    • From: "Shawn Erickson" <email@hidden>
  • Re: staticly linked libc ?
    • From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: Libstdc++ problems
• Next by Date: Re: staticly linked libc ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Libstdc++ problems
• Next by thread: Re: staticly linked libc ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread