Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gbit or Firewire 800



On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:05:47AM -0400, J?nos scratched on the wall:

> If I could invest into a Workgroup Cluster from Apple, my first dilemma 
> would be what interconnection to use.  

  Not really.  The Wordgroup Cluster comes with all the hardware for a
  GigE interconnect, including switches and network cables.

> Should I connect all the nodes 
> to a Gbit Ethernet switch using the 2 built in Gbit interface or use 
> the the two 800 Mbit/s Firewire connection to daisy chain them or to 
> connect them to a Firewire Hub ? 

  You should be aware that OS X does not (yet) support "bound" interfaces 
  (without third party tools).  That is to say, if you use both GigE
  ports, your nodes will each have one 1Gb connection to two different
  networks.  You will not have one virtual 2Gb network interface.  Same
  is true of the Firewire ports.

  Despite Apple's parading of Firewire for an HPC interconnect, I can't
  figure out for the life of me why you would ever want to do that.
  The only time it seems to make any sense to me is if you only have
  two nodes and are doing point-to-point.  Firewire is essentially a
  shared media, and while you can buy Firewire "hubs" (basically port
  repeaters) I don't think anyone makes a Firewire "switch" that does
  bandwidth isolation.  People claim Firewire has very low latency, but
  so does Ethernet-- it is the TCP/IP stack that kills your latency
  with traditional Ethernet/IP networks, not the physical wires-- and
  that's going to be true of Firewire too.

  Daisy chaining them isn't going to be easy.  The ports on the
  machine are not like the two ports on the back of a hard drive-- I
  don't think you can chain machines together and have them see one
  large "link."  I also suspect you'd would be hard pressed to find
  a 24 port Firewire hub.

  Am I missing something?  Anyone have any good reasons to use Firewire?

> The cluster would have minimum 12 
> nodes and do mostly bio-informatics related number crunching and 
> statistical computation.

  With that many nodes, I'd definitely use Ethernet.  16 (or 32) port
  GigE switches with full capacity backplanes are not that rare
  these days, and will provide a great deal more capacity than the
  Firewire solution.  Most Bioinformatics doesn't require extremely
  fast low-latency interconnects anyways.

   -j

-- 
                     Jay A. Kreibich | Integration & Software Eng.
                        email@hidden | Campus IT & Edu. Svcs.
          <http://www.uiuc.edu/~jak> | University of Illinois at U/C
_______________________________________________
xgrid-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xgrid-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >Gbit or Firewire 800 (From: János <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.