[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Should controller avoid being an agent?

Subject: Should controller avoid being an agent?
From: Dan Stowell <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:33:01 +0100

Hi,

Just about to get started with a little IP-address-based (as opposed to Rendezvous-based) Xgrid cluster. I'm going to use a G4 in my office as the controller. Is there any reason I should avoid activating the xgrid "agent" process on that same computer?

I presume that the controller's duties are unlikely to make too much demand on the processor, so it would seem sensible to allow the controller to spend some of its spare time as an agent....

Thanks
Dan
_______________________________________________
xgrid-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xgrid-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should controller avoid being an agent?
  - From: Charles PARNOT <email@hidden>
- Re: Should controller avoid being an agent?
  - From: János <email@hidden>

Prev by Date: Re: Re(2): Difference Between Xgrid Cluser and a Beowulf
Next by Date: Re: Should controller avoid being an agent?
Previous by thread: Re: Gbit or Firewire 800
Next by thread: Re: Should controller avoid being an agent?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home