Re: HITextView vs naked TXNObject

• Subject: Re: HITextView vs naked TXNObject
• From: Jan Brittenson <email@hidden>
• Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:13:31 -0800
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Macintosh/20041103)

Frederick Cheung wrote:

If you just want a little text field you should probably be using the Unicode edit text control (available since 10.0)

Oooh.  And it's just a checkbox in IB to make one of those instead a plain
MacRoman one.  Not only that, but my fields are already checked. :)  The
following in fact works like a charm:

Size size;
CFStringRef cfstr;
GetControlData(cref, kControlEditTextPart, kControlEditTextCFStringTag,
   sizeof cfstr, (void*)&cfstr, &size);

On the other side, SetControlData with the same part+tag works also.  I wish
all problems were this easy!!!

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: HITextView vs naked TXNObject
    • From: Laurence Harris <email@hidden>
  • Re: HITextView vs naked TXNObject
    • From: Frederick Cheung <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: HITextView vs naked TXNObject
• Next by Date: Re: HITextView vs naked TXNObject
• Previous by thread: Re: HITextView vs naked TXNObject
• Next by thread: Re: HITextView vs naked TXNObject
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread