On Mar 2, 2005, at 11:24 AM, Chris Espinosa wrote:
On Mar 2, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Peter S Lau wrote:
On Mar 2, 2005, at 1:45 PM, Chris Espinosa wrote:
On Mar 2, 2005, at 10:29 AM, John Stiles wrote:
All building is done via makefiles
and terminals.
It is a standard Carbon Application.
Isn't that a contradiction? ;) ;)
No, why would you think it is?
ah... every IDE project file is a make file... just like everything
on Mac OS 9 is are "Resource". :-)
No, that's not what I'm saying. It is perfectly sensible (if that's
the way you like to do things) to build Carbon applications on Mac OS
X using only vi/Emacs, makefiles, and the Shell, without using an IDE
or xcodebuild. People do it all the time. So "standard Cocoa
application" and "all building done by makefiles and terminals" is not
a contradiction.
I was wondering whether John thought you couldn't build Carbon apps
from the command line for some reason.
I know you can do it, but it's certainly not the "standard" way.
I guess it was a lame joke... never mind :)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
