Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
 Image of Mac OS face in stamp
Re: Tiger/G5 2Ghz way slower than Panther/G5 1Ghz?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tiger/G5 2Ghz way slower than Panther/G5 1Ghz?


On May 13, 2005, at 7:25 PM, Corey O'Connor wrote:

Just to clarify: The fast version is compiled on a 10.3 system, and
the slow version is compiled on a 10.4 system?

Is the target MachO and linked to the current system frameworks? In
other words, always links to the frameworks in /System and not the
frameworks in /Developer/SDK?

If the answer to both is yes, then you should know that application
linked under 10.4 to 10.4 libraries may have a different behavior than
one linked to the 10.3 libraries.

I don't recall every area that will have a different behavior. I think
window compositing is different somehow...

Anyways, checking out the notes for the relevant APIs for what changed
in 10.4 may help.

That's a good idea, if you're right about the OS releases that Bob is using. The relevant release notes are the HIToolbox notes at <http:// developer.apple.com/releasenotes/Carbon/HIToolbox.html>. Search for "coalesced updates" for a possible explanation.

-eric

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden







References: 


 >Tiger/G5 2Ghz way slower than Panther/G5 1Ghz? (From: Bob Sabiston <email@hidden>)


 >Re: Tiger/G5 2Ghz way slower than Panther/G5 1Ghz? (From: "Corey O'Connor" <email@hidden>)























Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.

1-800-MY-APPLE


Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy


Copyright © 2011 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.