| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 15.06.2007, at 02:46, Laurence Harris wrote:
That hasn't always been the official description. If that were the case then why have an announcement at last year's WWDC that Carbon would get 64-bit support? Why introduce an all new interface model (HIView) in the third major release of Mac OS X? Why would people want to abuse themselves carbonizing an old application just to have to redo it all again later in Cocoa?
| References: | |
| >Is Carbon Viable? (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Is Carbon Viable? (From: "Tom Saxton" <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Is Carbon Viable? (From: "stephen joseph butler" <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Is Carbon Viable? (From: "Steve Mills" <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Is Carbon Viable? (From: "stephen joseph butler" <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Is Carbon Viable? (From: "Demian M. Nave" <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Is Carbon Viable? (From: Steve Christensen <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Is Carbon Viable? (From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Is Carbon Viable? (From: Steve Christensen <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Is Carbon Viable? (From: Laurence Harris <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.