Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 64-bit dynamics [was: Is Carbon Viable?]



On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 3:46 AM, Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden> wrote:

>In fairness, by WWDC '06 you'd had 3 years of being told that you
>could go 64-bit with a client/server approach (since the G5 was
>launched in 2003).

64-bit performance on G5 wasn't much of a win, at least for us. The IPC
overhead more than ate up any gains from eliminating our own method of
handling "big data." It makes a much bigger difference on Intel. YMMV.

I also seem to recall that there were other Apple-induced "transitions"
keeping us busy at the time.

Still, my point was that no matter how well intentioned, Apple's advice
about development directions is pretty suspect, as far as I'm concerned.
(When you start remembering Copeland, it's not a good thing. Some
memories are best left to fade.)

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >64-bit dynamics [was: Is Carbon Viable?] (From: Paul Chadha <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 64-bit dynamics [was: Is Carbon Viable?] (From: Eric Albert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 64-bit dynamics [was: Is Carbon Viable?] (From: Durango <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 64-bit dynamics [was: Is Carbon Viable?] (From: "Finlay Dobbie" <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.