| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Dale Jensen wrote:
The Pascal to C/C++ transition, painful as it might have been, was a good thing. It brought Apple into line with the direction the industry as a whole was headed. Pascal was being used less and less by everyone else and C/C++ more and more. Now we have the opposite transition. We're going from a language still being heavily used by a lot of people to an obscure one used almost exclusively for Apple development. I guess you could argue that you only have to use it to touch the system APIs, but that still seems like quite a bit.
C/C++ is not becoming obsolete by any stretch of the imagination...at least nowhere but for Carbon developers being forced down another road. Ken -- Ken Worley Software Engineer, Tiberius, Inc. |
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Re: [ANN] Nano 1.4 (From: "Jan Barnholt" <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: [ANN] Nano 1.4 (From: Laurence Harris <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: [ANN] Nano 1.4 (From: Bryan Prusha <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Converting nibs (Re: [ANN] Nano 1.4) (From: Laurence Harris <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Converting nibs (Re: [ANN] Nano 1.4) (From: Dale Jensen <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.