[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What do we want in Carbon? (was Modern C++)

Subject: Re: What do we want in Carbon? (was Modern C++)
From: Eric Schlegel <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:57:49 -0800

On Nov 7, 2003, at 12:31 PM, Pete Gontier wrote:

If Apple were to skip the last step in the list above, it would "break"
application A. I assumed that by "work around" Eric was referring to the
last step in the list above. This sort of thing happens all the time. I
don't know how may details of the scenario above apply. I don't know what's
documented and what's not for these calls. I'm just reading Eric and
interpreting what he has written in this thread. And no, I do not have any
particular developer in mind. A stands for Application. :-)

This is all quite accurate. :)

-eric
_______________________________________________
carbon-development mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/carbon-development
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References:
	>Re: What do we want in Carbon? (was Modern C++) (From: Pete Gontier <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: Unicode conversation without CFString
Next by Date: Re: What do we want in Carbon? (was Modern C++)
Previous by thread: Re: What do we want in Carbon? (was Modern C++)
Next by thread: Re: What do we want in Carbon? (was Modern C++)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home