[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ObjC Method naming

Subject: Re: ObjC Method naming
From: Marco Scheurer <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 01:52:25 +0200

You won't for long. Once you get going I can almost guarantee that
you'll prefer Objective-C. Everyone else seems to. (The one major
exception are the mathematicians among us. Writing things like
quaternion classes that do operator overloading is more convenient in
C++. That comes at the huge cost of all the other C++ programmers
overloading operators willy-nilly to do who knows what.)

Nah... mathematicians prefer APL don't they? How could one live with the small, incoherent set of operators available for overloading in C++?

Marco Scheurer
Sen:te, Lausanne, Switzerland http://www.sente.ch

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ObjC Method naming
  - From: "David W. Halliday" <email@hidden>

References:
	>Re: ObjC Method naming (From: Greg Titus <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: ObjC Method naming
Next by Date: Re: filesystem notifications
Previous by thread: Re: ObjC Method naming
Next by thread: Re: ObjC Method naming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home