Re: Boggled By Bindings

• Subject: Re: Boggled By Bindings
• From: Jacob Lukas <email@hidden>
• Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:18:08 -0700
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

On Sep 30, 2004, at 6:09 PM, Jacob Lukas wrote:

Yeah, good point. Maybe overriding "arrangeObjects:" (without the "d") would work better in that case.

I think you'd have to override a lot of functions:
- addObject:
- addObjects:
- insertObject:atArrangedObjectIndex:
- insertObjects:atArrangedObjectIndexes:
- removeObjectAtArrangedObjectIndex:
- removeObjectsAtArrangedObjectIndexes:
- removeObject:
– removeObjects:

I'm sure some of them use each other, but you'd have to test and see. I think it would be easier to do it the way I first proposed.

Yes, I believe you're right.

However, easiet of all is to simply turn on auto notifications for arrangedObjects (which you have to do anyway) and make the custom key dependent on arrangedObjects.

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

• Prev by Date: Re: Boggled By Bindings
• Previous by thread: Re: Boggled By Bindings
• Next by thread: Re: Boggled By Bindings
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread