[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Newbie Help understanding Core Data

Subject: Re: Newbie Help understanding Core Data
From: Hamish Allan <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:36:42 +0100
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden


On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:50:09 -0400, SA Dev <email@hidden> wrote:

On Jul 28, 2005, at 12:40 PM, SA Dev wrote:

For simpler data models, it's inevitable that there'd be more
messages being sent (valueForKey, etc).


Let me clarify this - I meant to say, there'd be more messages being
sent *than are necessary*. That's the crux of my argument - less
unnecessary object messaging == better performance. :-)

I've only really been following this exchange in passing, so forgive me if this is a daft thing to say. But for the simple case, does the extra overhead not matter less anyway? If your "Notes" app is only serialising two pieces of information, your user isn't going to notice that ten extra messages (or whatever) needed to be sent, it's going to be near-enough instantaneous anyway. Cue premature optimisation debate ;)

Best wishes,
Hamish

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Newbie Help understanding Core Data
  - From: SA Dev <email@hidden>

Prev by Date: Re: Question on guidelines of integrating C++ calls inside an Obj C class
Next by Date: Re: Newbie Help understanding Core Data
Previous by thread: Re: Core Data performance (was: Newbie Help understanding Core Data)
Next by thread: Re: Newbie Help understanding Core Data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home