Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Universal Binary Wont Run on 10.3.9




On Apr 12, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Perry Clarke wrote:

On Apr 12, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Chris Parker wrote:
> If your requirements are such that your application will have to
> run back to 10.3 on PowerPC-based Macintoshes

Well ... yeah :-) I guess when I read that "universal binaries will run on 10.4 and 10.3.9 systems" I took that at face value. I understand the solution, it just makes the process less straightforward than the sales pitch might make one believe.

Well, Allan Hsu's suggestion elsewhere in this thread might get you further along the one-step-get-a-Panther-and-Tiger binary process (I had no idea you could do that SDKROOT trick - nifty).


More information could probably be found on the Xcode user's list.

Does anything else besides NSAffineTransform fall into this hole?

Well, the NSAffineTransform case is somewhat special in terms of a class moving from the Kit to Foundation. You're more likely to run into things like classes from 10.4 not being available on 10.3. You'd find that out pretty quickly trying to build 10.4 sources against the 10.3 headers, though.


.chris

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Universal Binary Wont Run on 10.3.9 (From: Perry Clarke <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Universal Binary Wont Run on 10.3.9 (From: Perry Clarke <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.