Distributed objects: Code required on both sides?

• Subject: Distributed objects: Code required on both sides?
• From: James Bucanek <email@hidden>
• Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:09:25 -0700
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

More distributed objects questions:

I have an application which talks to a server process via DO. Works great.

I now have a lot (and it's growing every day) of classes that only execute in the server. These objects never exist in my application except as proxy objects. I'd like to eliminate that code in my application so that the code only exists in the server.

Is this possible?

What I'd like to do is include the .h files for the server classes I use in my application and NOT compile their corresponding .m file. But when I try this I get link errors:

    Undefined symbols:
        .objc_class_name_CompactCommand
        collect2: Id returned 1 exit status
        
Is this because I have to include the implementation of the class in my client for Obj-C to do its thing, or is this simply because I've got some obscure reference to that class buried somewhere else in my app?

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Distributed objects: Code required on both sides?
    • From: Chris Hanson <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: Distributed objects: connecting to a process running as root?
• Next by Date: Re: Distributed objects: connecting to a process running as root?
• Previous by thread: Re: Distributed objects: connecting to a process running as root?
• Next by thread: Re: Distributed objects: Code required on both sides?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread