| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
It seems clear to me and at least a couple of others that there is an problem with this, but not to you. I'd like to file a bug report, but I'm obviously not doing a very good job of explaining the problem.I think we're at crossed purposes. I can certainly see some value in filing an enhancement request, but it wasn't clear to me this was the direction you were heading. My point was that there isn't any API available today that does what you want, and the solution is to use a copy of the data. Note, of course, that you're not making a copy of the original data, but rather the derived value.
Is it just not plain to you why someone might want to proxy data without making a copy of it? Daniel's locally-cached remote model seems to me to be a good example of this.
mmalc
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Re: KVO one-step listening but two-step notifying? (From: Hamish Allan <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.