Re: Threads and Core Data, bindings results in view corruption

• Subject: Re: Threads and Core Data, bindings results in view corruption
• From: David <email@hidden>
• Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:03:46 -0400
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=oDiPGV4sQHXTJZBRWzDZJPPyQPlGNL3RcE+2XkXp4O8=; b=J+jaxRiZ7GKa8dZFEGMlVqoa9Hc7GlZC53+rqID8drtM4JPUDvz85/wE1YGCsi09wbL/u0rvrW3rO3SstDQnJXC5NRq/8LNLGgXLDCptKuHuP+napgFt4A6gB2h6zx0jIK2FpZ86VshPL4ijf+yOfdJpyb3lpfIc9PrHipfxoh0=
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=X1enV6XYnxdIQnOL2PUKQK7VgcQFTSlgituqkDUCZf8HtZ79R/DF58rXDUshRUeiECxluIfiNLBVDJVCKLa4L+hH8LL2XRVBNOMu2saLG5327ho89mUP5gZ4JduQBjDj7ZHv95s1eCzGrDPKDjqdAnhBispKbd0UDlrv1PyK2W8=

I found a post with a solution similar to what I was asking about,
http://lists.apple.com/archives/student-dev/2006/Jun/msg00104.html
Essentially he proposed to maintain multiple mocs in sync using an in memory
persistent store. But I worry that that will be too slow and consume
excessive memory.
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

• Prev by Date: Bindings for NSComboBox?
• Next by Date: remote debugging between ppc & intel
• Previous by thread: Re: Threads and Core Data, bindings results in view corruption
• Next by thread: Re: Threads and Core Data, bindings results in view corruption
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread