Re: Lab for Office

• Subject: Re: Lab for Office
• From: "Daniel Lowicki" <email@hidden>
• Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:30:04 +0200
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

I am a bit confused by the info on this page:

http://www.color.org/membersonly/srgbprofiles.html

This could mean  rather use abscol with this profile generation
and it also sais that the BPC version should yield similar
results to the older sRGB.

I didn't do any testing though to see what the values say.
It's more that I am trying to sort out why I need the
new generation profiles. I do understand that the whitepoint
description of the older version was not correct.

-Daniel

On Aug 7, 2005, at 3:00 AM, Daniel Lowicki wrote:

Would it be better to use one of the newer:

sRGB IEC61966-2-1 noBPC
sRGB_IEC61966-2-1_withBPC.icc

I suggest "no" as the sRGB built in to Windows/Office
should be according to sRGB IEC61966-2.1.

Any comments ?

The black points for both LAB and sRGB are the same, so black point
compensation should make no difference.

Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
---------------------------------------------------------
Co-author "Real World Color Management, 2nd Ed"
Published by PeachPit Press (ISBN 0-321-26722-2)

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden

• Prev by Date: Re: Lab for Office
• Next by Date: Re: Lab for Office
• Previous by thread: Re: Lab for Office
• Next by thread: Re: Lab for Office
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread