> One good reason is it's
> easier to convince a demanding client that what they see on a dot-
> proof is what they'll get when the final piece is printed. Unless
> you're printing in stochastic (and a willing client to pay for it), a
> dot proof will give you, IMHO, a more accurate representation of
> solids and gradients than a digital proof. Screened type (one of our
> designers love to use 70% Black for text) and large blocks of solid
> colours come to mind.
I never do that with text, but I do have to screen fine diagonals fairly
often, and if the angle isn't right they come out looking jaggy and awful.
Since I'm using spot colors, I don't really care about the color fidelity of
the proof anywhere near as much as how the halftones look, so I'd probably
be one of the people complaining about getting a stochastic print to sign
off on myself.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
