| |||
| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
| The 2200 is a stable enough device. Certainly worlds better than the 1280, which was a tough printer to manage. I would not suggest putting any money into a RIP for a 1280! If you don't need to make prints bigger than 13" wide, and you aren't doing a LOT of printing, than the 2400 is certainly a more logical choice. Go with the newer technology, which won't dissapoint you. The K3 inks do make a difference on "photographic" types of media. If you do any kind of volume I might suggest a 4800 in lieu of the 2400. As far as RIP's go, you might not even need one. The driver for the 4800 is better than its ever been, and if it isn't meeting your needs just have a few custom profiles made. Good luck, Eric Bullock PixelPusherz Imaging www.pixelpusherz.net |
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden This email sent to email@hidden
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.
