> Converse to Epson's published specs, it's been our experience that the 4000
> printers are faster not slower than the 2200's.
This statement agrees with my personnal experience. I use a 4000 at my
studio and some of my clients use 2200's. I'm always appalled by the 2200's
snail pace in comparison to my 4000 (and in comparison to Canon's).
> One final issue. It appears from Epson's specs that the new 4800 printer will
> not be significantly faster than the current 4000 model. True or no?
I don't see how they made it faster: it's the same print engine with a
difference inkset if you ask me.
> Any and all comments would be welcome both on or off list. Thanks.
>
> Barry Gorrell
Regards,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
