|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
CIECAM is just one appearance model. There are others, some published some not. Some that I have evaluated far outperform CIECAM and in many ways are simpler. You can enthusiastically embrace appearance without embracing CIECAM.
> Apple publically stated their intention at the last GATF Color Management
> Conference NOT to embrace CIECAM, perhaps out of stubborness. But that
> does not mean "the rest of us" have to stand by the wayside while
> Microsoft pass us by at supersonic speed.
Whaa?! Very disappointing! Do they have a good reason for it?
If confirmed, that is a very troubling position for Apple to take. It seems
to me that there is no future for ColorSync without some implementation of a
color appearance model
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
Copyright © 2011 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.