> Now if you would like to see Colorsync and/or the ICC move away from
> "Dumb CMM" towards "Smart CMM", by all means campaign for it. CIECAM02
> may well be a component in a smart CMM, but to be recommending CIECAM02
> when there's nothing to apply it to, is rather putting the cart before
> the horse, IMHO ....
>
> Graeme Gill.
So why not have some sort of global preferences in ColorSync for SmartCMM
and DumbCMM? I know that would presupposes the implementation of a SmartCMM
at the OS level, it's not just as simple as, oh!, let's have this,it would
entail deep architectural changes in ColorSync's techhnology, but, given the
choice, I'd bet a lot of users would rather embrace use a SmartCMM
technology. After all, Microsoft will be supporting both WCS and ICC in
Vista. So, it's not like its a dumb idea?
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
