On 3 Nov 2009, at 14:36, Andrew Rodney wrote:
On Nov 3, 2009, at 7:27 AM, Martin Orpen wrote:
As I've now posted the images, profiles and method all that
remains is for you to admit that I was right and converting images
outside of Photoshop gives superior results.
Going back to the poor scientific mind set of yours, for the last
time, I’ll paste:
On Nov 2, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Martin Orpen wrote:
And you tested the same device link in CS4?
Don't see the point?
Sure, why try the same Device link in product A and Photoshop? Why
try ICC profile in product B and Photoshop? Having an apples to
apples comparison might invalidate the crappy results you seek. And
that doesn’t even account for the number of posts after you said
you’d rather have needles in your eyes until we actually got the
reality check that you were comparing ICC profiles in Photoshop to
Device Links in another product. And some are taking you seriously?
You sound surprised by that?
I think that a veteran repro guy who spends all day working on
colour conversions who says "I get better results with product x"
should be taken seriously on this forum.
Certainly more seriously than somebody with no comparable expertise
or experience.
CS4's ability to apply device link profiles is a tiny little fig
leaf covering the your embarrassing nakedness of CMS shortcomings.
I saw no point in testing it because the conversion itself is just
about the least significant part of the "outside of Photoshop"
colour conversion work.
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
