| |||
| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:08 AM, Martin Orpen wrote:
We were in the dying stages of a thread that has pretty conclusively shown that Adobe's choices of colour space in out of the box copies of Photoshop have become "standards" in the print industry.
On the subject of standards I find it interesting that Adobe's ProPhotoRGB is really Eastman Kodak's ROMM RGB renamed.
Did Adobe bring anything to that working space party or just rename it so that it sounded more like they created it?
No.
You make it sound so easy!
It is for most of us!
The point of my original post -- the bit that you snipped -- was that this "conversion" is problematic and that you can achieve much more impressive results by doing this outside of Photoshop.
Andrew Rodney http://www.digitaldog.net/ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.
