On 23/5/06 7:03, Dan Shoop <email@hidden> wrote:
> And if you think that the rc.d mechanism used so commonly today is an
> improvement or so great try answering the following common question:
> "what letter/number/name should I make my rc file to start up X?
> Which rc directory should it go under?" Such mechanisms are a huge
> step backwards and unbelievably fragile.
It is interesting that Sun also came to the same conclusion, and replaced it
with their Service Management Framework (SMF) in Solaris 10.
Has anyone compared launchd with SMF? Is there anything SMF does better than
launchd?
Cheers,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
