Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MacOS X equivalent of swapon/swapoff?



If you're careful, you can make changes on a test machine without too much worry.

For example: Apple changed dynamic_pager for (I think) Panther to start with a small 64-mb file and, when that one was outgrown, add another, then add one 2x its size, then one double that, etc.

I thought this was stupid.  I've got the disk space -- just allocate one 2x the main memory (which is my usual rule-of-thumb from my days of sysadmining) and be done with it.

So I changed /etc/rc from:

/sbin/dynamic_pager ${encryptswap} -F ${swapdir}/swapfile

to

#
# Use a single, large, fixed swapfile
#
/sbin/dynamic_pager ${encryptswap} -S 2147483648 -F ${swapdir}/swapfile

Now if only Darwin would support proper swap partitions (to ensure that the pagefile was contiguous and to remove filesystem I/O overhead), I'd be a happy camper.

But I'm not holding my breath.


In your case, you could:
a) Make a copy of the original /etc/rc as a backup
b) comment out the call to dynamic_pager
c) reboot.  

If the change causes untoward problems, you could then just boot single-user, move the original /etc/rc file back, and reboot.

John


On 10 Oct 2006, at 14:08, Alison Cassidy wrote:

On Oct 10, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:

On Oct 10, 2006, at 10:34 , Alison Cassidy wrote:

Fair point. However, I'm assuming the kernel memory management will deal accordingly in some sane manner. See; http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?swapoff+2

Mac OS X is not Linux :-}

Indeed! :)

In any case, from that man page, I don't see how you can do both of "quiet all disk activity" and avoid the problem I mention above (which really isn't specific to your process; modern OSs have a lot of processes that can fire at any time to handle the exigencies of the moment; they need to be able to run, or the system crumbles).

Right. I'll never quiet *all* disk activity; all I can hope for is to minimize it somehow.

You could, as mentioned earlier in this thread, avoid enabling the paging daemon.  With sufficient memory, you could run a full system, but things may start failing in strange ways without the elasticity provided by a backing store.  In case you haven't looked in depth at the Mac OS X VM system, it's all handled by the paging daemon.  There is no path to disk (for this purpose) within the kernel.

Right (and thanks John and Graham for the info there). I'd considered messing about with dynamic_pager but wouldn't like to modify the boot args nor kill it outright for very obvious reasons. I need to look into the workings of the paging daemon some more ...

Thanks again,

-- Allie
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >MacOS X equivalent of swapon/swapoff? (From: Alison Cassidy <email@hidden>)
 >Re: MacOS X equivalent of swapon/swapoff? (From: "Justin C. Walker" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: MacOS X equivalent of swapon/swapoff? (From: Alison Cassidy <email@hidden>)
 >Re: MacOS X equivalent of swapon/swapoff? (From: "Justin C. Walker" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: MacOS X equivalent of swapon/swapoff? (From: Alison Cassidy <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.