[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Limit on kevent entries?

Subject: Re: Limit on kevent entries?
From: Ian Lister <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:33:38 +1000 (EST)
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, maurits wrote:

OK, I'd highly appreciate any input. Portability is not an issue for me. But I have the feeling that kevents doesn't really scale too well, and I agree with you that I'm probably abusing the mechanism...

In general kqueues do scale well, and that's part of the purpose of them. We use them to multiplex I/O over many thousands of sockets. I haven't pushed them terribly hard on Darwin (just enough to hit some bugs in older versions) but I have no reason to believe they shouldn't scale well there too, relative to Darwin's level of low level performance in general.

Cheers,

Ian

P.S. if you continue to use kqueue, make sure you open the files with O_EVTONLY, if you aren't already. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>Limit on kevent entries? (From: maurits <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Limit on kevent entries? (From: Ian Lister <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Limit on kevent entries? (From: maurits <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: Limit on kevent entries?
Next by Date: Re: Limit on kevent entries?
Previous by thread: Re: Limit on kevent entries?
Next by thread: Re: Limit on kevent entries?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home