Re: Read-Timeout with Blocking Socket

• Subject: Re: Read-Timeout with Blocking Socket
• From: Josh Graessley <email@hidden>
• Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:06:35 -0800
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

select is so yesterday. Check out kqueue.

-josh

On Feb 19, 2007, at 5:23 AM, Colin Hirsch wrote:

On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 04:51:38PM -0600, Marc Epard wrote:

Call select with a timeout, then, depending on what select returns,
call read.

Select() is infinitely better than alarm or setitimer, but I would
recommund poll() rather than select(), if possible -- on most
systems it's faster, and I believe that it's also easier to use.

Regards, Colin
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/jgraessley% 40apple.com

This email sent to email@hidden

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

• Prev by Date: Re: X-compling on intel for 10.3 PPC
• Next by Date: netstat vs. Network Utility
• Previous by thread: Re: Read-Timeout with Blocking Socket
• Next by thread: -mmacosx-version-min and MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread