Re: Why no crash reporter if I install some signal handler on Leopard

• Subject: Re: Why no crash reporter if I install some signal handler on Leopard
• From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>
• Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:23:34 -0800
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

On Nov 27, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Terry Lambert wrote:

The following will work, but it's not ideal:

=======
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>

void sig_abort(int sig)
{
      printf("Application has been abort\n");
      abort();
}

...
It's not ideal because you can't really rethrow the abort with the same stack, you will always show as being in the trap handler (the stack for a crash report looks something like this (on a PPC):

It's also not ideal because printf() is not signal-handler-safe. ;-)

Very true.

-- Terry
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why no crash reporter if I install some signal handler on Leopard
    • From: zhanglin <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why no crash reporter if I install some signal handler on Leopard
• Next by Date: Re: Why no crash reporter if I install some signal handler on Leopard
• Previous by thread: Re: Why no crash reporter if I install some signal handler on Leopard
• Next by thread: Re: Why no crash reporter if I install some signal handler on Leopard
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread