I'm only interested in what is going in the file /mach_kernel. So are you
saying that I'm not able to build a /mach_kernel file for the Intel
platform using the available xnu sources for 10.4.8 which is equivalent
to the /mach_kernel file Apple provides as part of 10.4.8?
I thought that they are about the same and therefore there can not
be much difference in the source code files except for comments.
Just fyi, here's an "ls -l" for 10.4.9 on Intel. Despite the size
difference, the kernel from sources seems to work fine on the hardware we
have. (Does the vanilla one have more stuff linked in, instead of loading
kexts? Haven't a clue.)
rick
ps: I suspect mach_kernel.orig was actually an older 10.4 that 10.4.9,
looking at the date on it.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/email@hidden
