| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Oct 30, 2007, at 7:13 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Quinn writes: [snip]Obviously it is possible to improve things in this space. For example, we could have a group of engineers dedicated to keeping the open source and the internal source in close sync. Doing this, however, would require Apple to rebalance its priorities: to increase our commitment to open source requires a corresponding decrease in the cool features that we can ship to customers (and developers).
This makes no sense. The whole point of a software company going Open Source is to leverage the synergy of the community and allow your paid workforce to be more productive. Given many people's irrational love of MacOSX, I expect you'd gain lots of cool new features, and the main problem would be selecting the best ones. With the OpenSolaris development model, Sun provides an excellent example of how a traditionally closed source OS vendor has opened their development process.
cr
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Leopard Sources? (From: Andreas Fink <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Shaun Wexler <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Michael Tuexen <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Michael Smith <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: William Kucharski <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Quinn <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Leopard Sources? (From: Andrew Gallatin <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.