rick
ps: I suspect mach_kernel.orig was actually an older 10.4 that 10.4.9,
looking at the date on it.
Your comparison is flawed. You are comparing a single arch kernel
(mach_kernel) with a bi-arch kernel (mach_kernel.org).
Yea, it had crossed my mind that mach_kernel might be a fat binary. Thanks
for correcting.
I will point out that it does mean that I do use the kernel sources
though (related to other messages in the thread) and I do have a rather
large patch that adds nfsv4 support up anonymous ftp. I have been
reluctant to post patches on this mailing list, since it is awkward to
include the APSL notice in something like a source diff. When I've
encountered issues that I believe to be bugs in the kernel sources, I
have emailed Apple engineers about it. (In other words, Apple is getting
some feedback w.r.t. their open sourced kernel. Whether they find this
useful is another story, but...:-)
rick
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-kernel/email@hidden
