I all ready had a similar discussion with Terry about this a while ago.
You guys know that if Apple developed and supported a way of function
hooking, it could include information in crash reports about what kext/
process is hooking a process or the kernel. If your worried about
support costs, how about not supporting a app when it is being hooked?
On Apr 23, 2008, at 9:24 PM, Terry Lambert wrote:
On Apr 23, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Bob Murphy wrote:
So how does one distinguish the Rosetta process from the PPC
surrogate?
You don't.
Let me put this pretty bluntly... how would you like to be the poor
engineer catching bug reports because Joe Blows thread that he ran
in your address space happened to overwrite something critical
because Joe Blow made a mistake in his code? How much worse would
this be if someone were giving out cookbooks to people who otherwise
were beginning coders?
Now ask yourself again why this is unsupported...
-- Terry
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
