[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ref: UFS or HFS+... more efficient?

Subject: Re: Ref: UFS or HFS+... more efficient?
From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:47:15 +0100

There's a technote on this somewhere, you might like to search for it. I forget the exact URL, get to it from http://til.info.apple.com

-- Finlay

On Thursday, June 21, 2001, at 01:55 am, Glen wrote:

I'm really not an expert here, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt, but I would think that in the Unix universe, for efficiency, compatibility *is* the issue. Your decision then would rest on what you needed to be more compatible with - Mac (HFS+) or Unix (UFS).

References:
	>Ref: UFS or HFS+... more efficient? (From: Glen <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Ref: UFS or HFS+... more efficient?
Next by Date: Re: XFree on Mac OS X
Previous by thread: Ref: UFS or HFS+... more efficient?
Next by thread: Re: Ref: UFS or HFS+... more efficient?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home