Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

list hiccup (Ref: UFS or HFS+... more efficient?)

Sorry about that, there was a list time-delay hiccup and I didn't think the first one sent when I sent this one. Moderator, please feel free to delete this second one from any archives. Thank you. 8-)

|- @10:56 PM -0400 on 6/20/01; [Glen] sent: (Ref: UFS or HFS+... more efficient?) following -->
|- @12:06 PM -0700 on 6/20/01; [Ryan Dary] sent: (UFS or HFS+... more efficient?) following -->
I am wondering which file system is more efficient and which would be recommended to be used with Darwin/OS X?

Of course some may say that HFS+ has better Classic compatibility, but that is not what I mean. I strictly mean which file system will allow Mac OS X/Darwin to function optimally and why.

- Ryan



I'm really not an expert here, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt, but I would think that in the Unix universe, for efficiency, compatibility *is* the issue. Your decision then would rest on what you needed to be more compatible with - Mac (HFS+) or Unix (UFS).

Hope this helps.

Shalom!
Glen
_______________________________________________
darwinos-users mailing list
email@hidden
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwinos-users

References: 
 >Ref: UFS or HFS+... more efficient? (From: Glen <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.